Speaking of which, what were you talking about earlier, Mr. Vulka?
"What did you just say? I wonder what it is."
"You two were talking about whether to experiment to confirm the therapeutic effect. Maybe you're thinking of using living humans as experimental materials."
"Well, if we're going to see the effect of the cure that's happening right now, we need to talk to the actual patient. What are you taking for granted?"
"Wow. Are you two going to do that? I can't help you with that either. There's nothing horrible about human experimentation."
"That's a bad way to put it. It's a clinical trial. Instead of taking treatment data on actual patients, it just reduces the burden of treatment costs. I think it's a win-win relationship because it's cheap to get treatment."
"... really? I don't suppose you can't force people who don't like it to take your suspicious medicine at night, Barca."
"I won't do that, painter. Anyway, I'm a real person with a decent feeling."
"... well, let's do that. That means treating patients who are actually ill, checking whether they have healed or not, and compiling data. It doesn't matter to me because I don't have to paint."
"No, that's right. Will the painter participate in the clinical trial? [M] I think that some diseases have distinctive physical changes, so let's have them depicted."
"... oh, no. It was a snake. Master Balka, I want to draw a picture."
"Rest assured. I'll just let you paint it so that it won't be any more."
"Ugh, how did this really happen? I can't believe my dream painter life ended up like this...."
"I'm so glad you're crying. Oh, and I'm talking about the clinical trial earlier, but I'm not just going to see if it's healed or not. Remember, I'm going to ask you to get some data."
"Well, isn't that right? What do you want me to do?
"I already explained it to Meem, but I think we should do a comparative test. You should know better about the cure."
Human anatomy is still incomplete.
However, it seems that the painter was interested in the clinical trial after the autopsy.
I can't just leave it to Meem anyway, so I'll involve the painter from now on.
That's what I decided to talk to you about now.
Determination of therapeutic effect.
I don't know much about how to do it, but in my previous life, I used to handle medical information on TV and so on.
I remember what I heard in it and explained it to Meem.
It meant that it was not accurate to simply treat a patient with a disease and discuss whether it had healed or not as a way to confirm the effect of the treatment.
Is it an effective treatment if it is actually treated and cured?
That's how I felt when I saw it on TV.
However, it seems that there are cases where the symptoms are healed even if they are completely ineffective.
For example, if a great teacher, such as a medical professor at some university, sees him and treats him, many people usually think that there is no basis for saying "this will be better".
Or even if you take medicine that says it works well for your disease.
Even if it is actually ineffective, people can be cured by mere assumption.
No Comments Yet
Post a new comment
Register or Login